| LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY |
Page
1 of 3 |
| by Donald Liss, MD |
The patient who presents with sciatica and
with a clinical radicular pattern of pain needs careful attention.
Especially in an era when there is a tendency to "lump"
and set up "clinical protocols," it becomes imperative
that the initial diagnostic impressions be sharpened as much
as possible.
Fortunately, in lumbosacral radiculopathy,
sharpening one’s acumen can bear fruitful results. As
goes the accuracy of the initial diagnosis... so goes the
success with treatment.
As Sir William Osler stated at the turn
of the century, "Eighty percent of diagnoses are made
on the basis of an accurate medical history." Generally,
clinical examination is useful for confirming one’s
suspicion’s and ruling out more definitively one’s
peripheral concerns.
What then are the crucial components of
medical history in the patient with lumbosacral radiculopathy
which must be distinguished.
Classical discogenic history
First, the description of the classical
discogenic history is crucial since all other conditions will
vary from that history and should therefore be able to be
distinguished from it. In the classical discogenic history,
the patient has generally begun with back pain weeks to months
before the acute episode. This pain is often described as
an ache. Depending upon the degree of pressure on the nerve
root, the low back pain may even subside as buttock and leg
pain intensify. The factors which worsen the pain include
activities of flexion. Therefore, sitting is worse than standing
which is worse than lying. This has been proven to correlate
with disc pressure mechanics, by Alf Nachemson, MD, in his
elegant study in 1973 in which he measured pressure in the
disc space in different body positions. Other activities which
increase pressure upon the disc and therefore exacerbate discogenic
pain include twisting/rotation activities as well as bending
at the waist. In addition, coughing, sneezing and straining
(Valsalva maneuver) increase disc pressure and exacerbate
radicular pain as well. Arising from a seat after sitting
for a period of time often exacerbates pain; it is believed
that the disc has been allowed to migrate posteriorly and
is now "caught" or "squeezed" as one attempts
to straighten up. In what often seems a paradox to the patient,
getting from sitting to standing position may be excruciatingly
painful, yet once upright, the patient feels almost no pain.
Robin McKenzie has posited that this is the result of centralization
of bulging or herniated disc material. Centralization techniques
have in fact been proven to reduce radicular symptoms. In
addition, most patients with discogenic pain complain of increased
pain for the first 30 minutes or so of their waking hours,
a phenomenon attributed to central pooling of interstitial
fluid and resultant "swelling" of the disc upon
first awakening. After the patient has been up and around
for several minutes, and the disc has partially "desaturated",
the patient often feels quite well comparatively.
Lumbar stenosis
Compared to the above classical discogenic
history, patients with lumbar stenosis have a significantly
contrasting history. Unlike patients with discogenic radiculopathy,
lumbar stenosis is uncommon in the 30s and 40s. It is, in
fact, uncommon before approximately age 55. There is often
a history of significant prior disc or facet joint disease.
The onset of pain is spontaneous or insidious, with gradual
progression. Sudden changes in symptoms require an explanation
other than simple lumbar stenosis,e.g., superimposed disc
disease or tumor.
|